In
its November 2015 newsletter, the International Diabetes
Federation announced they want world leaders to use sugar taxes to fight
obesity. They argue doing so would save
lives and lower healthcare costs.
They
remind us that in G20 countries, diabetes affects 286 million people and
generates diabetes-related healthcare costs of $572 billion in 2014. I won’t bore you about which countries make
up the “G20 world gang” other than to say the United States is one.
They
also remind us that worldwide, 415 million people suffer from diabetes and by
2040 this will grow to 642 million people.
So
let’s do some math to see how this sugar tax might work closer to home.
Here
in the United States, apparently, the average person consumes more than 126
grams of sugar per day. This is about
two and one-half times the daily intake recommended by the World Health
Organization (another world gang).
Pass
me a couple more chocolate chip cookies to give me an energy boost so I can tell
you more.
Now
according to the American Diabetes Association, the estimated total healthcare
cost of diagnosed diabetes in the United States was $245 billion in 2012. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the 2012
population was 314.1 million.
Let’s
use these numbers to calculate how a sugar tax might work with the goal of
having this sugar tax totally pay for the healthcare cost of diabetes.
Let’s
also give everyone a sugar consumption standard deduction of sorts equal to the
World Health Organization’s recommended daily allowance for sugar
consumption. As mentioned above, that’s
50 grams per day.
The
economists at Pierini
Fitness have crunched the numbers and announce this sugar tax would
amount to three cents per gram of sugar consumed in excess of the 50 grams per
day recommended daily allowance.
So
those two chocolate chip cookies I asked you to give me would cost me a sugar
tax of 48 cents.
On
second thought, don’t bring me those cookies.
Pax
Domini sit semper vobiscum
No comments:
Post a Comment